Court upholds $800K tab for leaking underground tanks
Company reportedly is again using the contaminated site.
LANSING — Michigan is owed more than $800,000 for cleanup costs, civil fines and administrative penalties for failure to properly remediate three sites with leaking underground storage tanks in Berrien County, the state Court of Appeals has ruled.
The tab may rise if the state has to complete the long-delayed work, but the defendants have asked the Michigan Supreme Court to review the case.
At issue are petroleum products that leaked from underground tanks at two gas stations and a bulk fuel distribution center in Galien and Baroda, west of Niles and north of the Indiana border. The sites still haven’t been cleaned, according to the Department of Environmental Quality.
According to the appeals court, Baroda-based Strefling Oil Co. had used the properties since at least 1986. Between 1994 and 2001, petroleum products leaked into the ground at all three locations.
The company notified the state of the releases and was told to hire a consultant, clean up the contamination and submit “final assessment reports” to the DEQ. After Strefling Oil failed to submit the reports, the department sued the company, as well as its vice president and a related company that co-owns the land.
A Court of Claims judge found the defendants liable under the state’s Natural Resources Environmental Protection Act and ordered them to pay fines, damages and penalties.
In upholding that decision 2-1, the Court of Appeals said, “Strefling Oil does not dispute that it filled and used the tanks at each site. The use of the tanks rendered Strefling Oil responsible for the tanks and responsible for releases of petroleum products from the tanks.”
The court also rejected the defense argument that company Vice President Ronald Strefling and family-owned Strefling Real Estate Investments — the property owners — shouldn’t be held financially responsible.
“The fact that the property owners didn’t own the tanks does not insulate them from liability because they controlled the property on which the tanks were located and had extensive knowledge of the tank operations,” the court said in an opinion signed by Judges Peter O’Connell and Stephen Borrello.
Ronald Strefling was a company officer and employee and knew the purpose of the tanks, the majority said. As a result, the owners could reasonably anticipate that use of the tanks could cause petroleum products to leak.
But one member of the three-judge panel voted against holding Ronald Strefling and Strefling Real Estate Investments liable. Making them liable, Judge Christopher Murray said, “is equivalent to saying that just because one knows how underground storage tanks operate, one is responsible for any release from tanks on one’s property — even if one did not operate the tanks.”
Murray said that under the majority’s reasoning, the only way the property owners could have avoided responsibility for a possible leak would have been to prohibit Strefling Oil from operating the tanks.
Defense lawyer Patrick Drueke of Grand Rapids said the decision conflicts with what the Legislature intended when it amended the environmental law in 1995. He cited a legislative analysis saying that change eliminated liability for property owners “unless the person caused the contamination.”
He said the appeals court decision creates a risk that property owners who want to lease their land will have “little room to insulate themselves from liability” for leaking underground tanks, even if they themselves aren’t involved in the operation.
“You have to do more than say, ‘You’re a property owner and you’re liable,’” Drueke said.
And in its filing with the state Supreme Court, the defendants called the case “of great concern to all property owners in Michigan which lease property to commercial or industrial businesses which involve the storage, handling or use of products which contain hazardous substances.”
According to the DEQ, Strefling Oil hasn’t notified the state that cleanup in complete.
“After no activity since approximately 2005, Strefling has resumed activities at the three sites within the last few months,” said Frank Ballo, the Kalamazoo district supervisor of DEQ’s Remediation and Redevelopment Division. “The work has included installation of soil borings and monitoring wells and collection of soil and groundwater samples.”
Ballo said the division has been in contact with the company’s consultant but “has not received any submittals from this work.”
Based on the company’s previous non-compliance, DEQ has tentatively approved spending from the state Refined Petroleum Fund to hire its own environmental consultants “and undertake necessary corrective actions at the properties to protect public health and the environment,” he said.
Work could start as soon as October if Strefling Oil fails to complete the cleanup. If that happens, the state could recoup the costs under the court judgment, he said.